Services - Stroke Prevention & TreatmentAcute Stroke Protocol
tPA Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form (PDF) Disclaimer This protocol was developed by the Stroke Service and members of the Stroke Taskforce at Boston Medical Center and outlines the major responsibilities for the urgent evaluation and treatment of acute stroke patients who present to the ED. This information is intended to be used only as a medical and educational reference tool. It does not replace or overrule the treating physician's judgment or diagnosis. We tried to keep the information as accurate as possible and therefore disclaim any implied warranty or representation about its accuracy or appropriateness for a particular purpose. This stroke protocol is subject to change without notice. |
| Emergency Department Stroke Care Process Measure Assessment Tool | |
|
Activity |
Time Targets |
|
Door to notification of Acute Stroke Team (AST), i.e., making the call to the team* |
within 5 minutes of arrival |
|
Time from notification of AST to response of team member by phone or at patient bedside to assess patient* |
within 5 minutes of being called |
|
Door to CT scan or MRI scan |
within 25 minutes |
|
Door to CT result |
within 45 minutes |
|
Door to completion of chest X-Ray and interpretation |
within 45 minutes |
|
Door completion of ECG and interpretation |
within 45 minutes |
|
Door to completion of labs and results/interpretation |
within 45 minutes |
|
Results (labs, CT) to tPA decision time* |
Within 10 minutes |
|
ED door-to-needle time for IV thrombolytic (t-PA) treatment |
within 60 minutes |
|
Time from order of neurosurgical evaluation to start of evaluation; includes transfer to another hospital for such evaluation, if applicable |
within 2 hours of being deemed clinically necessary |
|
Neurosurgical intervention |
as needed urgently |
|
* DPH stroke care recommendations modified for BMC. Guidelines for Use of Intravenous tPA in Acute Ischemic StrokeApproved FDA use for LESS than 3.0 hours from initial symptoms | |
|
A. Indications
B. Contraindications
C. Warnings (risks must be weighted against anticipated benefits)
D. Not a contraindication
E. For those patients presenting with a suspected stroke to the Emergency Room:
F. For those patients with a suspected stroke while hospitalized
G. Once tPA has been started –
H. Administration
t-PA Dosing (estimated weight)Print tPA Dosing Chart (HTML) |
| Estimated Weight (lbs) | Conversion to Kilograms (Kg) | Total iv t-PA Dose (mg) at 0.9 mg/kg | t-PA Bolus (mg) *10% of total* | t-PA Bolus (ml) | Discard Dose t-PA (Not for infusion) | Infusion Dose (mg) | Infusion Rate (ml/hr) |
|
220+ |
100.0 |
90.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
10.0 |
81.0 |
81.0 |
|
210 |
95.5 |
85.9 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
14.1 |
77.3 |
77.3 |
|
200 |
90.9 |
81.8 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
18.2 |
73.6 |
73.6 |
|
190 |
86.4 |
77.7 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
22.3 |
70.0 |
70.0 |
|
180 |
81.8 |
73.6 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
26.4 |
66.3 |
66.3 |
|
170 |
77.3 |
69.5 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
30.5 |
62.6 |
62.6 |
|
160 |
72.7 |
65.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
34.5 |
58.9 |
58.9 |
|
150 |
68.2 |
61.4 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
38.6 |
55.2 |
55.2 |
|
140 |
63.6 |
57.3 |
5.7 |
5.7 |
42.7 |
51.5 |
51.5 |
|
130 |
59.1 |
53.2 |
5.3 |
5.3 |
46.8 |
47.9 |
47.9 |
|
120 |
54.5 |
49.1 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
50.9 |
44.2 |
44.2 |
|
110 |
50.0 |
45.0 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
55.0 |
40.5 |
40.5 |
|
100 |
45.5 |
40.9 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
59.1 |
36.8 |
36.8 |
|
"If the patient has a significant neurological deficit (ie NIHSS > 10) and/or CTA demonstrates proximal vessel occlusion, the neurointerventional team should be activated early (pager 2645 or COIL), i.e. as soon as the decision to give tPA has been established. I. Monitoring:
|
REFERENCESDe Smedt A, De Raedt S, Nieboer K, De Keyser J, Brouns R. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in a stroke patient treated with dabigatran. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;30:533–534 Ganetsky M, Babu KM, Salhanick SD, Brown RS, Boyer EW. Dabigatran: review of pharmacology and management of bleeding complications of this novel oral anticoagulant. J Med Toxicol. 2011 Dec;7(4):281-7. Watanabe M, Siddiqui FM, Qureshi AI. Incidence and management of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in patients on dabigatran etexilate treatment. Neurocrit Care. 2012 Feb;16(1):203-9. Alberts M., Bernstein R., Naccarelli G., Garcia D. Using Dabigatran in Patients With Stroke A Practical Guide for Clinicians. Stroke. 2012; 43: 271-279 del Zoppo G, Saver J, Jauch EC, et al. Expansion of the Time Window for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke WithIntravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator. A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association/American StrokeAssociation. Stroke 2009; 40: 2945. De Silva DA, Manzano JJ, Chang HM, Wong MC. Reconsidering recent myocardial infarction as a contraindication for IV stroke thrombolysis. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21490319> Neurology 2011;76:1838-40. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1317-29. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-7. Rost NS, Masrur S, Pervez MA, Viswanathan A, Schwamm LH. Unsuspected coagulopathy rarely prevents IV thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2009 Dec 8;73(23):1957-62. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Selim M, Kumar S, Fink J, Schlaug G, Caplan LR, Linfante I. Seizure at stroke onset: should it be an absolute contraindication to thrombolysis? Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;14(1):54-7. Addendum A: DABIGATRAN (PRADAXA):
|



